If you had to use one word to characterize the 2007 College Football season, you might have a couple of good options along the lines of “insane”, “unpredictable”, and “crazy”.
What if you had two words?
Without a doubt, the catch-phrase of 2007 was “spread offense”. Oregon. West Virginia. Kansas. Dixon. White. Tebow.
Duck Sports News talked to former Duck and Tennessee Titan Peter Sirmon about the spread offense for a version of “The 4|4 with Peter Sirmon”. What we wanted to know was what he thought about the impact of the spread offense on the current state of college football, what it means for the future of the NFL, and its affect on the Ducks.
DSN: How will the spread offense in college football affect offensive talent in the NFL?
Peter: With the developing trend of spread offenses in college, I think it will begin to send a better overall athlete to the NFL at the QB position. I don’t believe the NFL will change what they want to see in a QB. Mobility, durability, passing strength, leadership, and decision making will always be what QB’s are graded on, no matter what offense they run in college. The spread will be huge in the overall development of all skill positions feeding into the NFL. Receiver will become more adept at route running and reading defenses, running backs will become more prolific pass catchers, and tight ends will be more productive when they break out of their traditional roles. The NFL will love a more polished skill player coming into the league.
DSN: What’s the future of the pure pocket passer in college football? Will he be able to make it to the NFL?
Peter: The future is very cloudy for the average pure pocket passer in college. There will always be a premium for a guy that is like, Drew Bledsoe, Carson Palmer, or Payton Manning. It will be the marginal pocket passers that will be eliminated. Every coach is looking for a player that can run and throw. If you can’t run very well then you had better be an exceptional passer. Ultimately the role of a QB is to deliver the ball to the players around him. If a QB cannot throw effectively then in essence it will be nine versus eleven with the advantage to the defense. So, for as exciting a running QB can be sometimes, he will ALWAYS have to throw the football effectively for a team to consistently win. Also, another consideration is if you start a trend of recruiting better runners than passers at the QB position then can you recruit receivers? Without receivers then you go to running the wishbone.
DSN: How will Oregon adopting the spread offense affect its offensive NFL prospects?
Peter: With Oregon running the spread offense it will help attract the most dynamic offenses players in the country. Top shelf high school players want to play in a wide-open style of offense. They want the ball often and in open space so they can use their athleticism. You don’t ever hear of a recruit wanting to go to a school that runs a boring smash mouth style of offense. Most offenses want the smash mouth attitude without actually having to do it. Playing in “space” is a big catch phrase that you will hear leading up to the draft. Scouts say a player can or cannot play in “space.” When they say you cannot play in “space,” then it’s time to look for another line of work. “Space” simply means being able to make plays against speed. A linebacker that can’t play in “space” is said to be more of a run stuffer and a liability against the pass. Many players initially come in playing offense or defense and eventually change for any number of reasons: size, ability, or if they have an opportunity to get on the field sooner if they change sides of the ball. As long as Oregon recruits the players that can play against speed and develop their size and strength once they get to school, then the spread offense will do nothing but help the program continue to be one of the best in the country.
DSN: Is the spread offense a fad or a trend?
Peter: I see the spread offense as a trend of offenses continually trying to get more productivity out of the most important player on your football team, the QB. Playing defense in the NFL is easier schematically because you don’t have to account for the QB running on every play. Playing against a QB that can both run and throw is a nightmare for defensive coaches. The possibilities are endless with how they can attack. Give the defenses time and they will become better at slowing down the spread attack. There has yet to be an offense that remains as prolific in its infancy as it does in adulthood. The more defensive players and coaches play against it the better they will become at stopping it. Once you put something on tape it just becomes a race to continue to evolve and improve before the other team catches up and passes you by.
DSN did ask Peter if he had any comments on UCLA hiring Rick Neuheisel. Peter thought that Josh Wilcox did a pretty good job of covering that topic.
- JJ